AAGFF
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
34.05M
FMCXF
Price
$1.93
Change
-$0.02 (-1.03%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
855.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAGFF vs FMCXF

Header iconAAGFF vs FMCXF Comparison
Open Charts AAGFF vs FMCXFBanner chart's image
Aftermath Silver
Price$0.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$305.14K
Capitalization34.05M
Foran Mining
Price$1.93
Change-$0.02 (-1.03%)
Volume$138.1K
Capitalization855.42M
AAGFF vs FMCXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAGFF vs. FMCXF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAGFF is a Hold and FMCXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AAGFF: $0.64 vs. FMCXF: $1.93)
Brand notoriety: AAGFF and FMCXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAGFF: 66% vs. FMCXF: 137%
Market capitalization -- AAGFF: $34.05M vs. FMCXF: $855.42M
AAGFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $34.05M. FMCXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $855.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAGFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AAGFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCXF is a better buy in the long-term than AAGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAGFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAGFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMCXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAGFF is a better buy in the short-term than FMCXF.

Price Growth

AAGFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while FMCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCXF($855M) has a higher market cap than AAGFF($34M). AAGFF YTD gains are higher at: 115.864 vs. FMCXF (-29.304). AAGFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.15M vs. FMCXF (-11.42M). FMCXF has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. AAGFF (1M). AAGFF has less debt than FMCXF: AAGFF (292K) vs FMCXF (35.1M). AAGFF (0) and FMCXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AAGFFFMCXFAAGFF / FMCXF
Capitalization34M855M4%
EBITDA-8.15M-11.42M71%
Gain YTD115.864-29.304-395%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1M158M1%
Total Debt292K35.1M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AAGFF vs FMCXF: Fundamental Ratings
AAGFF
FMCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7233
SMR RATING
1..100
9690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3589
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMCXF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AAGFF (58). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to AAGFF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AAGFF (72). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AAGFF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as AAGFF (96). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to AAGFF’s over the last 12 months.

AAGFF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCXF (89). This means that AAGFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

AAGFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (100). This means that AAGFF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAGFFFMCXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVRUX17.680.11
+0.63%
UBS US Dividend Ruler P
WFPRX50.480.22
+0.44%
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value R6
PVEJX15.940.06
+0.38%
Principal MidCap Value I J
EMAAX16.170.01
+0.06%
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions A
JRGRX29.19-0.07
-0.24%
JHancock Regional Bank R6

AAGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AAGFF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AAGFF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAGFF
1D Price
Change %
AAGFF100%
-0.95%
AGXPF - AAGFF
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
GRSLF - AAGFF
43%
Loosely correlated
-5.72%
GLNCY - AAGFF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
IVPAF - AAGFF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
AZMCF - AAGFF
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
More

FMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCXF has been loosely correlated with CSCCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCXF jumps, then CSCCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCXF
1D Price
Change %
FMCXF100%
-1.03%
CSCCF - FMCXF
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
LUNMF - FMCXF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
IVPAF - FMCXF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
HBM - FMCXF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
AAGFF - FMCXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More