AAFRF
Price
$2.85
Change
+$0.31 (+12.16%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.62B
MACT
Price
$6.50
Change
-$1.50 (-18.75%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAFRF vs MACT

Header iconAAFRF vs MACT Comparison
Open Charts AAFRF vs MACTBanner chart's image
Airtel Africa
Price$2.85
Change+$0.31 (+12.16%)
Volume$208
Capitalization5.62B
MachTen
Price$6.50
Change-$1.50 (-18.75%)
Volume$1.9K
CapitalizationN/A
AAFRF vs MACT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAFRF vs. MACT commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAFRF is a Hold and MACT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AAFRF: $2.86 vs. MACT: $6.50)
Brand notoriety: AAFRF and MACT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAFRF: 4% vs. MACT: 91%
Market capitalization -- AAFRF: $5.62B vs. MACT: $0
AAFRF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $5.62B. MACT’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAFRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMACT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AAFRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MACT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAFRF is a better buy in the long-term than MACT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAFRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MACT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAFRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MACT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAFRF is a better buy in the short-term than MACT.

Price Growth

AAFRF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +6.93% price change this week, while MACT (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -18.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.01% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAFRF YTD gains are higher at: 132.094 vs. MACT (-7.801).
AAFRFMACTAAFRF / MACT
Capitalization5.62BN/A-
EBITDA1.78BN/A-
Gain YTD132.094-7.801-1,693%
P/E Ratio16.47N/A-
Revenue5.38BN/A-
Total Cash968MN/A-
Total Debt4.15BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAFRFMACT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MACT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRMB85.241.05
+1.25%
Trimble
OGCP7.39N/A
N/A
Empire State Realty OP LP
MBWM47.71-0.27
-0.56%
Mercantile Bank Corp
GIFI6.80-0.11
-1.59%
Gulf Island Fabrication
HUBC3.55-0.27
-7.07%
Hub Cyber Security Ltd

AAFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAFRF and KORE have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAFRF and KORE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAFRF
1D Price
Change %
AAFRF100%
+11.96%
KORE - AAFRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.06%
IHS - AAFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
CHRUF - AAFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACT - AAFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKBNF - AAFRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MACT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MACT and TCPFF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MACT and TCPFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MACT
1D Price
Change %
MACT100%
N/A
TCPFF - MACT
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETLF - MACT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHS - MACT
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
AAFRF - MACT
1%
Poorly correlated
+11.96%
KORE - MACT
-0%
Poorly correlated
-7.06%
More