AAFRF
Price
$3.02
Change
+$0.07 (+2.37%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
10.91B
IHS
Price
$7.04
Change
+$0.08 (+1.15%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.36B
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AAFRF vs IHS

Header iconAAFRF vs IHS Comparison
Open Charts AAFRF vs IHSBanner chart's image
Airtel Africa
Price$3.02
Change+$0.07 (+2.37%)
Volume$2.72K
Capitalization10.91B
IHS Holding
Price$7.04
Change+$0.08 (+1.15%)
Volume$478.99K
Capitalization2.36B
AAFRF vs IHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AAFRF vs. IHS commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAFRF is a StrongBuy and IHS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AAFRF: $3.02 vs. IHS: $7.04)
Brand notoriety: AAFRF and IHS are both not notable
AAFRF represents the Major Telecommunications, while IHS is part of the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AAFRF: 50% vs. IHS: 62%
Market capitalization -- AAFRF: $10.91B vs. IHS: $2.36B
AAFRF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $10.91B. IHS’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AAFRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIHS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AAFRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AAFRF is a better buy in the long-term than IHS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AAFRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IHS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AAFRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IHS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AAFRF is a better buy in the short-term than IHS.

Price Growth

AAFRF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while IHS (@Real Estate Development) price change was +5.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

IHS is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AAFRF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than IHS($2.36B). AAFRF has higher P/E ratio than IHS: AAFRF (32.78) vs IHS (21.33). AAFRF (145.183) and IHS (141.096) have similar YTD gains . AAFRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.44B vs. IHS (831M). AAFRF has more cash in the bank: 784M vs. IHS (629M). IHS has less debt than AAFRF: IHS (3.96B) vs AAFRF (6.2B). AAFRF has higher revenues than IHS: AAFRF (5.21B) vs IHS (1.73B).
AAFRFIHSAAFRF / IHS
Capitalization10.9B2.36B461%
EBITDA2.44B831M294%
Gain YTD145.183141.096103%
P/E Ratio32.7821.33154%
Revenue5.21B1.73B301%
Total Cash784M629M125%
Total Debt6.2B3.96B157%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AAFRFIHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AAFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PABD61.810.32
+0.53%
iSharesParis-AlgndClmOptdMSCIWldexUSAETF
VEA58.870.26
+0.44%
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
NYF52.110.02
+0.04%
iShares New York Muni Bond ETF
XRLX45.53N/A
N/A
FundX Conservative ETF
SMN13.65-0.01
-0.11%
ProShares UltraShort Materials

AAFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AAFRF and KORE have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAFRF and KORE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AAFRF
1D Price
Change %
AAFRF100%
+2.24%
KORE - AAFRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-6.17%
IHS - AAFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
CHRUF - AAFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACT - AAFRF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKBNF - AAFRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IHS and LILA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IHS and LILA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHS
1D Price
Change %
IHS100%
+1.15%
LILA - IHS
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
JLL - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
TDS - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
LILAK - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
RMAX - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More