Advertisement
AAFRF vs CHRUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAFRF is a Hold and CHRUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AAFRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCHRUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AAFRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CHRUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AAFRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHRUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AAFRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CHRUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
AAFRF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -4.72% price change this week, while CHRUF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.79%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+0.72% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| AAFRF | CHRUF | AAFRF / CHRUF | |
| Capitalization | 17.9B | 2.36B | 758% |
| EBITDA | 2.84B | 694M | 409% |
| Gain YTD | -11.581 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 35.63 | 1295.59 | 3% |
| Revenue | 5.57B | 950M | 586% |
| Total Cash | 804M | 81M | 993% |
| Total Debt | 6.23B | 3.3B | 189% |
| AAFRF | CHRUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 17% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 10% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 43% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 29% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HEAT | 30.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Touchstone Climate Transition ETF | |||
| CFA | 93.48 | -0.06 | -0.06% |
| VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF | |||
| MARM | 33.08 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Mar | |||
| QQWZ | 26.01 | -0.06 | -0.23% |
| Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq100RotatorETF | |||
| DIVO | 45.36 | -0.18 | -0.40% |
| Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | |||
AAFRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AAFRF and HKBNF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AAFRF and HKBNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AAFRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAFRF | 100% | -2.43% | ||
| HKBNF - AAFRF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KORE - AAFRF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| CHRUF - AAFRF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETLF - AAFRF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MACT - AAFRF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CHRUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHRUF has been closely correlated with GTMEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHRUF jumps, then GTMEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GTMEF - CHRUF | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AAFRF - CHRUF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
| HKBNF - CHRUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETLF - CHRUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KORE - CHRUF | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||