Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AAEMX vs RNWHX
AAEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AAEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets A
Price$13.13
Change-$0.13 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.14M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.23
Change-$0.78 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
AAEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 37.66B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 19.14M to 75.3B. RNWHX holds the highest valuation in this group at 75.3B. The lowest valued company is AAEMX at 19.14M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 15%. AAEMX experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while RNWHX experienced the biggest fall at 1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
AAEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AAEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. AAEMX (19.1M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AAEMX: RNWHX (0.91) vs AAEMX (0.36). AAEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AAEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AAEMX (2.35) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AAEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AAEMX: RNWHX (250) vs AAEMX (1000). AAEMX (19.75) and RNWHX (19.18) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.36 vs. AAEMX (1.35).
| AAEMX | RNWHX | AAEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.72 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 0.72 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.094 | 27.611 | 91% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.91 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.75 | 19.18 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.63 | 47.28 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.35 | 19.36 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.02 | 103.97 | 81% |