AACI
Price
$10.28
Change
+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Updated
Sep 4, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
323.8M
GRAF
Price
$10.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4, 01:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
301.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AACI vs GRAF

Header iconAACI vs GRAF Comparison
Open Charts AACI vs GRAFBanner chart's image
Armada Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.28
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization323.8M
Graf Global
Price$10.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization301.59M
AACI vs GRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AACI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AACI vs. GRAF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AACI is a Hold and GRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AACI: $10.25 vs. GRAF: $10.49)
Brand notoriety: AACI and GRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AACI: 1% vs. GRAF: 1%
Market capitalization -- AACI: $323.8M vs. GRAF: $301.59M
AACI [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $323.8M. GRAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $301.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.13M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AACI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AACI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AACI and GRAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AACI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AACI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRAF is a better buy in the short-term than AACI.

Price Growth

AACI (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.19% price change this week, while GRAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.35% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AACI($324M) has a higher market cap than GRAF($302M). AACI YTD gains are higher at: 5.128 vs. GRAF (3.964). AACI has more cash in the bank: 480K vs. GRAF (107K).
AACIGRAFAACI / GRAF
Capitalization324M302M107%
EBITDAN/A-880.41K-
Gain YTD5.1283.964129%
P/E RatioN/A22.80-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash480K107K449%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AACIGRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
31%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
22%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AACI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPKYY8.46N/A
N/A
Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.
SHNWF5.33N/A
N/A
Schroders Plc.
IQEPY3.60N/A
N/A
IQE Plc
TKOMY42.79-0.67
-1.54%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
TIGCF0.24-0.02
-7.57%
Triumph Gold Corp

AACI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AACI has been loosely correlated with GRAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AACI jumps, then GRAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AACI
1D Price
Change %
AACI100%
N/A
GRAF - AACI
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ISRLU - AACI
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASUUF - AACI
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKUU - AACI
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSUF - AACI
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRAF has been loosely correlated with CUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRAF jumps, then CUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAF
1D Price
Change %
GRAF100%
N/A
CUB - GRAF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AACI - GRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALF - GRAF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OAKUU - GRAF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRTLF - GRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More