Advertisement
AACG vs AFYA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AACG is a Hold and AFYA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AACG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAFYA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AACG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- AFYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AACG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AFYA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AACG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- AFYA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AACG (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +5.08% price change this week, while AFYA (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
AFYA is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-2.17% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| AACG | AFYA | AACG / AFYA | |
| Capitalization | 39.4M | 1.33B | 3% |
| EBITDA | -31.16M | 1.55B | -2% |
| Gain YTD | 46.572 | -6.545 | -712% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 10.18 | - |
| Revenue | 280M | 3.55B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 34.7M | 1.1B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 45.5M | 3.23B | 1% |
AACG | AFYA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AACG's Valuation (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFYA (93). This means that AACG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
AACG's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as AFYA (100). This means that AACG’s stock grew similarly to AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
AFYA's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AACG (96). This means that AFYA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AACG’s over the last 12 months.
AACG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as AFYA (63). This means that AACG’s stock grew similarly to AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
AACG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFYA (87). This means that AACG’s stock grew significantly faster than AFYA’s over the last 12 months.
| AACG | AFYA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% |
Advertisement
AACG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AACG and MYND have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AACG and MYND's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AACG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AACG | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| MYND - AACG | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
| BCO - AACG | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STG - AACG | 16% Poorly correlated | +4.00% | ||
| REZI - AACG | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| AFYA - AACG | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||
AFYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFYA has been loosely correlated with ADT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFYA jumps, then ADT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFYA | 100% | +1.38% | ||
| ADT - AFYA | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| GHC - AFYA | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| DLB - AFYA | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| LOPE - AFYA | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BCO - AFYA | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||