Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.58
Change+$0.15 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. AABCX (2.39B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: AABCX (2.83) vs RLBFX (2.19). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.63 vs. AABCX (9.58). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.92 vs. AABCX (7.29).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.115 | 2.743 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.19 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 13.63 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.43 | 39.55 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.29 | 38.92 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.20 | 93.66 | 47% |