Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBFX
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.68
Change-$0.17 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
AABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. AABCX (2.34B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: AABCX (2.73) vs RLBFX (1.97). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: AABCX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. AABCX (1.41). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.06 vs. AABCX (13.98).
| AABCX | RLBFX | AABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.223 | 16.507 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 1.97 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.41 | 10.28 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.61 | 44.74 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.98 | 43.06 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.50 | 81.39 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement