Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AABCX vs RLBCX
AABCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts AABCX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal C
Price$16.32
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.23
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
AABCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AABCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AABCX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. AABCX (2.39B). AABCX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: AABCX (2.83) vs RLBCX (1.66). AABCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: AABCX (31 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). AABCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). AABCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). AABCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: AABCX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.90 vs. AABCX (9.58). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.32 vs. AABCX (7.29).
| AABCX | RLBCX | AABCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.89 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.115 | 2.714 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 1.66 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 12.90 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.43 | 36.95 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.29 | 35.32 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.20 | 86.04 | 51% |