A
Price
$139.68
Change
-$3.19 (-2.23%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
39.54B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XGN
Price
$7.11
Change
-$0.10 (-1.39%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
161.13M
99 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

A vs XGN

Header iconA vs XGN Comparison
Open Charts A vs XGNBanner chart's image
Agilent Technologies
Price$139.68
Change-$3.19 (-2.23%)
Volume$1.96M
Capitalization39.54B
Exagen
Price$7.11
Change-$0.10 (-1.39%)
Volume$227.2K
Capitalization161.13M
A vs XGN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
A vs. XGN commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is A is a Hold and XGN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (A: $142.87 vs. XGN: $7.21)
Brand notoriety: A and XGN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: A: 68% vs. XGN: 56%
Market capitalization -- A: $39.54B vs. XGN: $161.13M
A [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $39.54B. XGN’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $161.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $12.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

A’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXGN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • A’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XGN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, A is a better buy in the long-term than XGN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

A’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XGN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • A’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XGN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XGN is a better buy in the short-term than A.

Price Growth

A (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while XGN (@Medical Specialties) price change was -3.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

A is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

XGN is expected to report earnings on Mar 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-0.17% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
A($39.5B) has a higher market cap than XGN($161M). XGN YTD gains are higher at: 75.854 vs. A (7.014). A has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.8B vs. XGN (-13.51M). A has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. XGN (35.7M). XGN has less debt than A: XGN (26M) vs A (3.41B). A has higher revenues than XGN: A (6.79B) vs XGN (63.6M).
AXGNA / XGN
Capitalization39.5B161M24,534%
EBITDA1.8B-13.51M-13,306%
Gain YTD7.01475.8549%
P/E Ratio30.56N/A-
Revenue6.79B63.6M10,673%
Total Cash1.54B35.7M4,300%
Total Debt3.41B26M13,112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
A vs XGN: Fundamental Ratings
A
XGN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
653
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
4498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

A's Valuation (19) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as XGN (45) in the null industry. This means that A’s stock grew similarly to XGN’s over the last 12 months.

A's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XGN (100) in the null industry. This means that A’s stock grew somewhat faster than XGN’s over the last 12 months.

A's SMR Rating (44) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XGN (98) in the null industry. This means that A’s stock grew somewhat faster than XGN’s over the last 12 months.

A's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as XGN (63) in the null industry. This means that A’s stock grew similarly to XGN’s over the last 12 months.

A's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XGN (100) in the null industry. This means that A’s stock grew somewhat faster than XGN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXGN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XGN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DARP45.710.44
+0.97%
Grizzle Growth ETF
PY53.290.41
+0.78%
Principal Value ETF
DWLD47.020.18
+0.38%
Davis Select Worldwide ETF
ALAI37.60N/A
N/A
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
VCRB78.22-0.02
-0.02%
Vanguard Core Bond ETF

A and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, A has been closely correlated with MTD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if A jumps, then MTD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To A
1D Price
Change %
A100%
-0.42%
MTD - A
85%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
WAT - A
82%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
TMO - A
80%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
RVTY - A
79%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
DHR - A
77%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More

XGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XGN and QDEL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XGN and QDEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XGN
1D Price
Change %
XGN100%
+0.98%
QDEL - XGN
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
MXCT - XGN
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
A - XGN
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
ISRG - XGN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
NOTV - XGN
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
More