Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PASRX vs RGNBX
PASRX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts PASRX vs RGNBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R
Price$22.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.03B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$21.90
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.69B
PASRX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PASRX vs. RGNBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PASRX is a StrongBuy and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. PASRX (3.03B). PASRX pays higher dividends than RGNBX: PASRX (1.43) vs RGNBX (0.94). PASRX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: PASRX (23 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PASRX (1.26). PASRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). PASRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNBX: PASRX (0) vs RGNBX (250). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. PASRX (5.63). RGNBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. PASRX (33.08).
| PASRX | RGNBX | PASRX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.40 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.40 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.384 | 16.628 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.03B | 21.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.94 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 11.71 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.46 | 42.29 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.08 | 36.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.33 | 74.91 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers