PALT
Price
$3.18
Change
+$0.11 (+3.58%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
39 days until earnings call
WFCF
Price
$10.90
Change
-$0.08 (-0.73%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PALT vs WFCF

Header iconPALT vs WFCF Comparison
Open Charts PALT vs WFCFBanner chart's image
Paltalk
Price$3.18
Change+$0.11 (+3.58%)
Volume$50.52K
CapitalizationN/A
Where Food Comes From
Price$10.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.73%)
Volume$3.83K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
PALT vs WFCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PALT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
PALT vs. WFCF commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PALT is a Hold and WFCF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (PALT: $2.96 vs. WFCF: $11.36)
Brand notoriety: PALT and WFCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PALT: 270% vs. WFCF: 160%
Market capitalization -- PALT: $28.22M vs. WFCF: $57.7M
PALT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $28.22M. WFCF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $57.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PALT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PALT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PALT is a better buy in the long-term than WFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PALT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PALT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

PALT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -37.68% price change this week, while WFCF (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

PALT is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

WFCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFCF($57.7M) has a higher market cap than PALT($28.2M). WFCF has higher P/E ratio than PALT: WFCF (27.64) vs PALT (14.12). PALT YTD gains are higher at: 26.496 vs. WFCF (-16.167). WFCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.7M vs. PALT (-1.17M). PALT has more cash in the bank: 13.6M vs. WFCF (2.64M). PALT has less debt than WFCF: PALT (77K) vs WFCF (2.8M). WFCF has higher revenues than PALT: WFCF (25.1M) vs PALT (11M).
PALTWFCFPALT / WFCF
Capitalization28.2M57.7M49%
EBITDA-1.17M3.7M-31%
Gain YTD26.496-16.167-164%
P/E Ratio14.1227.6451%
Revenue11M25.1M44%
Total Cash13.6M2.64M515%
Total Debt77K2.8M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PALT vs WFCF: Fundamental Ratings
PALT
WFCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
214
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8655
SMR RATING
1..100
9250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4073
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PALT's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as WFCF (61). This means that PALT’s stock grew similarly to WFCF’s over the last 12 months.

WFCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PALT (86). This means that WFCF’s stock grew similarly to PALT’s over the last 12 months.

WFCF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PALT (92). This means that WFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PALT’s over the last 12 months.

PALT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFCF (73). This means that PALT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFCF’s over the last 12 months.

PALT's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WFCF (88). This means that PALT’s stock grew significantly faster than WFCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PALT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 2 months ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PALT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

PALT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PALT and OTRK have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PALT and OTRK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PALT
1D Price
Change %
PALT100%
-7.79%
OTRK - PALT
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.87%
RAMP - PALT
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
ALRM - PALT
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
INLX - PALT
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
WFCF - PALT
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.65%
More

WFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WFCF and PAYS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFCF and PAYS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFCF
1D Price
Change %
WFCF100%
+4.65%
PAYS - WFCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
ISDR - WFCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
INLX - WFCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
MPLN - WFCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
SMRT - WFCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
More