Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAEAX vs RGNBX
PAEAX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts PAEAX vs RGNBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr A
Price$22.84
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.03B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$21.90
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.69B
PAEAX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAEAX vs. RGNBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAEAX is a StrongBuy and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. PAEAX (3.03B). PAEAX pays higher dividends than RGNBX: PAEAX (1.63) vs RGNBX (0.94). PAEAX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: PAEAX (32 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PAEAX (1.01). PAEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). PAEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNBX: PAEAX (0) vs RGNBX (250). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. PAEAX (6.16). RGNBX (36.01) and PAEAX (35.69) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PAEAX | RGNBX | PAEAX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.40 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.40 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.611 | 16.628 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.03B | 21.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.94 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 11.71 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.00 | 42.29 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.69 | 36.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.96 | 74.91 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers