MLGO
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
QH
Price
$1.34
Change
-$0.06 (-4.29%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

MLGO vs QH

Header iconMLGO vs QH Comparison
Open Charts MLGO vs QHBanner chart's image
MicroAlgo
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Volume$25.21M
CapitalizationN/A
Quhuo
Price$1.34
Change-$0.06 (-4.29%)
Volume$735.06K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
MLGO vs QH Comparison Chart
Loading...
MLGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
MLGO vs. QH commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLGO is a Sell and QH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (MLGO: $0.39 vs. QH: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: MLGO and QH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLGO: 87% vs. QH: 6%
Market capitalization -- MLGO: $28.86M vs. QH: $3.66M
MLGO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $28.86M. QH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QH is a better buy in the long-term than MLGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLGO’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLGO’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QH is a better buy in the short-term than MLGO.

Price Growth

MLGO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -18.70% price change this week, while QH (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLGO is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2023.

QH is expected to report earnings on Aug 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLGO($28.9M) has a higher market cap than QH($3.66M). MLGO has higher P/E ratio than QH: MLGO (96.15) vs QH (3.21). QH YTD gains are higher at: -77.429 vs. MLGO (-95.685). QH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.8M vs. MLGO (-14.84M). MLGO has less debt than QH: MLGO (1.25M) vs QH (104M). QH has higher revenues than MLGO: QH (3.69B) vs MLGO (73.6M).
MLGOQHMLGO / QH
Capitalization28.9M3.66M789%
EBITDA-14.84M47.8M-31%
Gain YTD-95.685-77.429124%
P/E Ratio96.153.212,998%
Revenue73.6M3.69B2%
Total CashN/A178M-
Total Debt1.25M104M1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLGOQH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MLGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

MLGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLGO has been loosely correlated with CXM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLGO jumps, then CXM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGO
1D Price
Change %
MLGO100%
+5.47%
CXM - MLGO
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
CYN - MLGO
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
RCM - MLGO
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
LKCO - MLGO
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
EVH - MLGO
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
More

QH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QH and GDC have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QH and GDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QH
1D Price
Change %
QH100%
-5.20%
GDC - QH
29%
Poorly correlated
+11.35%
APCX - QH
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
GXAI - QH
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.96%
BKKT - QH
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.91%
MLGO - QH
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.47%
More