Advertisement
LVS vs MSC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVS is a StrongBuy and MSC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LVS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMSC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LVS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MSC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LVS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LVS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MSC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +6.57% price change this week, while MSC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -8.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+1.40% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| LVS | MSC | LVS / MSC | |
| Capitalization | 45.1B | 718M | 6,281% |
| EBITDA | 4.38B | 273M | 1,604% |
| Gain YTD | 32.554 | -33.982 | -96% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.02 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 12.3B | 679M | 1,811% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 173M | - |
| Total Debt | 15.8B | 2.18B | 726% |
LVS | MSC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 44 | 26 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSC's Valuation (46) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (60). This means that MSC’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSC (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (17) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSC (93). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSC (63). This means that LVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSC (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than MSC’s over the last 12 months.
| LVS | MSC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | about 1 month ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMRGX | 8.86 | 0.05 | +0.57% |
| Emerging Markets Equities Fund M | |||
| HFQCX | 7.03 | 0.03 | +0.43% |
| Janus Henderson Global Equity Income C | |||
| RPMIX | 9.71 | 0.02 | +0.21% |
| Royce Small-Cap Fund Instl | |||
| TRXAX | 12.79 | 0.02 | +0.16% |
| Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced A | |||
| MMMPX | 28.12 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts R6 | |||
LVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| WYNN - LVS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 68% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| SCHYY - LVS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BYD - LVS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
MSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MSC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC | 100% | -5.69% | ||
| CNTY - MSC | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SCHYF - MSC | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
| CZR - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| FLL - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.72% | ||
| LVS - MSC | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||