Advertisement
KARO vs PHR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KARO is a Buy and PHR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KARO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- KARO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PHR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KARO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KARO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PHR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KARO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.52% price change this week, while PHR (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.04%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
KARO is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.
PHR is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Services to the Health Industry (-2.97% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| KARO | PHR | KARO / PHR | |
| Capitalization | 1.4B | 1.35B | 103% |
| EBITDA | 1.35B | 7.13M | 18,906% |
| Gain YTD | 2.589 | -7.989 | -32% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.08 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.76B | 450M | 1,058% |
| Total Cash | 1.1B | 98.3M | 1,122% |
| Total Debt | 556M | 12.8M | 4,344% |
PHR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| KARO | PHR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 3 days ago 88% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FEBRX | 15.63 | 0.09 | +0.58% |
| First Eagle Global Income Builder R6 | |||
| GMLGX | 37.11 | 0.10 | +0.26% |
| GuideMark® Large Cap Core Service | |||
| STVZX | 11.01 | 0.01 | +0.09% |
| Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6 | |||
| FCGMX | 22.29 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| NYLI PineStone Global Equity Class R6 | |||
| FDGKX | 42.64 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Dividend Growth K | |||
KARO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KARO has been loosely correlated with LSPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KARO jumps, then LSPD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KARO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KARO | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| LSPD - KARO | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| QTWO - KARO | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| PLTR - KARO | 31% Poorly correlated | -6.53% | ||
| SHOP - KARO | 31% Poorly correlated | -6.55% | ||
| PHR - KARO | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.68% | ||
More | ||||
PHR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHR has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHR jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHR | 100% | +1.76% | ||
| COIN - PHR | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| CLSK - PHR | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.09% | ||
| QTWO - PHR | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| QLYS - PHR | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| RIOT - PHR | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.21% | ||
More | ||||