Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs MNMCX
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$15.12
Change-$0.09 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.22M
HBLSX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. MNMCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and MNMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MNMCX (299M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLSX (3.19) vs MNMCX (1.42). HBLSX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLSX (15 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLSX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). MNMCX (3.72) and HBLSX (3.65) have marching annual gain over last year. HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 13.88 vs. MNMCX (-2.89).
| HBLSX | MNMCX | HBLSX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.81 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.603 | 7.491 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 299M | 3,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.42 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.65 | 3.72 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.31 | 22.33 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | -2.89 | -480% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.32 | 9.94 | 466% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers