Advertisement
GTM vs LIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GTM is a Hold and LIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- LIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GTM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.95% price change this week, while LIF (@Packaged Software) price change was -19.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTM is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| GTM | LIF | GTM / LIF | |
| Capitalization | 3.25B | 6.04B | 54% |
| EBITDA | 251M | 16.3M | 1,540% |
| Gain YTD | -0.666 | 86.407 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.68 | 208.19 | 16% |
| Revenue | 1.23B | 427M | 287% |
| Total Cash | 177M | 433M | 41% |
| Total Debt | 1.56B | 309M | 505% |
| GTM | LIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 78% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PRILX | 67.06 | 0.19 | +0.28% |
| Parnassus Core Equity Institutional | |||
| LFSFX | 28.88 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F | |||
| SEBLX | 31.13 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| Touchstone Balanced A | |||
| LGCSX | 20.36 | -0.04 | -0.20% |
| Lord Abbett Global Equity R4 | |||
| BDBPX | 26.96 | -0.08 | -0.30% |
| iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Inv P | |||
GTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTM | 100% | -1.23% | ||
| COIN - GTM | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| CLSK - GTM | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.09% | ||
| HUBS - GTM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| DOX - GTM | 52% Loosely correlated | -7.86% | ||
| EVCM - GTM | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
LIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIF has been loosely correlated with INTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIF jumps, then INTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIF | 100% | +5.69% | ||
| INTA - LIF | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| PAR - LIF | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| PCOR - LIF | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| GTM - LIF | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| NOW - LIF | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||