Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRCX vs RGAHX
GGRCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$13.70
Change-$0.29 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
GGRCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GGRCX (172M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GGRCX (26 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGAHX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. GGRCX (-10.87). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. GGRCX (-31.53).
| GGRCX | RGAHX | GGRCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.44 | 405% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.44 | 470% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.182 | 19.894 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.87 | 9.02 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.05 | 65.43 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.53 | 40.79 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement