Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRAX vs RGAHX
GGRAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GGRAX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
Price$8.85
Change-$0.19 (-2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
GGRAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRAX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GGRAX (172M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GGRAX: RGAHX (0.44) vs GGRAX (0.00). GGRAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GGRAX (26 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GGRAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRAX: RGAHX (250) vs GGRAX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. GGRAX (-19.64). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. GGRAX (-20.14).
| GGRAX | RGAHX | GGRAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.44 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.44 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.475 | 19.894 | -73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.64 | 9.02 | -218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.60 | 65.43 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.14 | 40.79 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement