Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGRAX vs RGAFX
GGRAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts GGRAX vs RGAFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
Price$8.85
Change-$0.19 (-2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.34
Change-$1.95 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
GGRAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRAX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GGRAX (172M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than GGRAX: RGAFX (0.52) vs GGRAX (0.00). GGRAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: GGRAX (26 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). GGRAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). GGRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRAX: RGAFX (250) vs GGRAX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. GGRAX (-19.64). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.72 vs. GGRAX (-20.14).
| GGRAX | RGAFX | GGRAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.34 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.34 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.475 | 19.981 | -72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.64 | 9.22 | -213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.60 | 66.11 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.14 | 41.72 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.08 | 104.95 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement