GAME
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.06 (-7.50%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
LFMD
Price
$5.21
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GAME vs LFMD

Header iconGAME vs LFMD Comparison
Open Charts GAME vs LFMDBanner chart's image
GameSquare Holdings
Price$0.74
Change-$0.06 (-7.50%)
Volume$394.11K
CapitalizationN/A
LifeMD
Price$5.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$352.09K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
GAME vs LFMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
GAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LFMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
GAME vs. LFMD commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAME is a Hold and LFMD is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (GAME: $0.95 vs. LFMD: $5.04)
Brand notoriety: GAME and LFMD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAME: 188% vs. LFMD: 84%
Market capitalization -- GAME: $41.84M vs. LFMD: $399.48M
GAME [@Packaged Software] is valued at $41.84M. LFMD’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $399.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAME’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFMD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GAME’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFMD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GAME is a better buy in the long-term than LFMD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFMD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LFMD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFMD is a better buy in the short-term than GAME.

Price Growth

GAME (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.51% price change this week, while LFMD (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAME is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2023.

LFMD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMD($399M) has a higher market cap than GAME($41.8M). LFMD YTD gains are higher at: -39.204 vs. GAME (-47.508). LFMD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.89M vs. GAME (-24.13M). LFMD has more cash in the bank: 33.1M vs. GAME (2.45M). GAME has less debt than LFMD: GAME (10.5M) vs LFMD (18.9M). LFMD has higher revenues than GAME: LFMD (153M) vs GAME (39.9M).
GAMELFMDGAME / LFMD
Capitalization41.8M399M10%
EBITDA-24.13M-7.89M306%
Gain YTD-47.508-39.204121%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue39.9M153M26%
Total Cash2.45M33.1M7%
Total Debt10.5M18.9M56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAME vs LFMD: Fundamental Ratings
GAME
LFMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2665
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GAME's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LFMD (91). This means that GAME’s stock grew somewhat faster than LFMD’s over the last 12 months.

LFMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GAME (100). This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to GAME’s over the last 12 months.

GAME's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as LFMD (100). This means that GAME’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.

LFMD's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as GAME (85). This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to GAME’s over the last 12 months.

LFMD's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GAME (100). This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to GAME’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAMELFMD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
90%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GAME
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LFMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

GAME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GAME and SNELF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAME and SNELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAME
1D Price
Change %
GAME100%
-8.64%
SNELF - GAME
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFIV - GAME
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
ANY - GAME
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.82%
LFMD - GAME
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
APCX - GAME
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
More

LFMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFMD and LYFT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFMD and LYFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFMD
1D Price
Change %
LFMD100%
-3.26%
LYFT - LFMD
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
RBLX - LFMD
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
NRDY - LFMD
28%
Poorly correlated
-9.16%
PRVA - LFMD
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.22%
DUOL - LFMD
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
More