FLD
Price
$3.05
Change
-$0.09 (-2.87%)
Updated
Nov 14, 10:49 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
150.96M
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PJT
Price
$166.44
Change
+$0.41 (+0.25%)
Updated
Nov 14, 02:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.04B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs PJT

Header iconFLD vs PJT Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs PJTBanner chart's image
Fold Holdings
Price$3.05
Change-$0.09 (-2.87%)
Volume$200
Capitalization150.96M
PJT Partners
Price$166.44
Change+$0.41 (+0.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.04B
FLD vs PJT Comparison Chart in %
FLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PJT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. PJT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Hold and PJT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FLD: $3.14 vs. PJT: $166.02)
Brand notoriety: FLD and PJT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 9% vs. PJT: 69%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $150.96M vs. PJT: $4.04B
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $150.96M. PJT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePJT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PJT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PJT is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PJT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PJT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PJT is a better buy in the short-term than FLD.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while PJT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

PJT is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.08% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PJT($4.04B) has a higher market cap than FLD($151M). PJT has higher P/E ratio than FLD: PJT (25.39) vs FLD (5.21). PJT YTD gains are higher at: 5.704 vs. FLD (-71.712). PJT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 345M vs. FLD (-29.75M). PJT has more cash in the bank: 215M vs. FLD (6.61M). FLD has less debt than PJT: FLD (79.9M) vs PJT (415M). PJT has higher revenues than FLD: PJT (1.54B) vs FLD (5.19M).
FLDPJTFLD / PJT
Capitalization151M4.04B4%
EBITDA-29.75M345M-9%
Gain YTD-71.7125.704-1,257%
P/E Ratio5.2125.3921%
Revenue5.19M1.54B0%
Total Cash6.61M215M3%
Total Debt79.9M415M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PJT: Fundamental Ratings
PJT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
13
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDPJT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PJT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVDKX38.73N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value Discovery K
FHEQX13.80N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq A
VDSIX26.29-0.46
-1.72%
Victory Diversified Stock I
GSMCX38.89-0.76
-1.92%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
FNEEX77.19-1.95
-2.46%
American Funds New Economy 529-F-2

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and PIPR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and PIPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
+1.29%
PIPR - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
LAZ - FLD
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
PWP - FLD
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
MC - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
PJT - FLD
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

PJT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJT has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PJT jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PJT
1D Price
Change %
PJT100%
-2.64%
PIPR - PJT
82%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
MC - PJT
80%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
HLI - PJT
77%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
EVR - PJT
76%
Closely correlated
-4.53%
PWP - PJT
73%
Closely correlated
-3.41%
More