Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIQFX vs LNGZX
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison
Open Charts FIQFX vs LNGZX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$54.88
Change-$0.56 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
Columbia Greater China Inst
Price$49.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
FIQFX vs LNGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIQFX vs. LNGZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIQFX is a Hold and LNGZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LNGZX (53M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than LNGZX: FIQFX (1.09) vs LNGZX (0.91). FIQFX was incepted earlier than LNGZX: FIQFX (7 years) vs LNGZX (29 years). LNGZX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). LNGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LNGZX: FIQFX (0) vs LNGZX (2000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.95 vs. LNGZX (35.04). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.01 vs. LNGZX (-36.39).
| FIQFX | LNGZX | FIQFX / LNGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.39 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.773 | 34.011 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 53M | 3,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.95 | 35.04 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.24 | 39.73 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | -36.39 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement