ESQ
Price
$97.44
Change
-$2.15 (-2.16%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
833.85M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBS
Price
$70.67
Change
-$0.60 (-0.84%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.86B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ESQ vs SFBS

Header iconESQ vs SFBS Comparison
Open Charts ESQ vs SFBSBanner chart's image
Esquire Financial Holdings
Price$97.44
Change-$2.15 (-2.16%)
Volume$58.75K
Capitalization833.85M
ServisFirst Bancshares
Price$70.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.84%)
Volume$176.57K
Capitalization3.86B
ESQ vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
ESQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ESQ vs. SFBS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ESQ is a StrongBuy and SFBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (ESQ: $97.44 vs. SFBS: $70.67)
Brand notoriety: ESQ and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ESQ: 91% vs. SFBS: 73%
Market capitalization -- ESQ: $833.85M vs. SFBS: $3.86B
ESQ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $833.85M. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ESQ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ESQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ESQ is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ESQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ESQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESQ is a better buy in the short-term than SFBS.

Price Growth

ESQ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.91% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

ESQ is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($3.86B) has a higher market cap than ESQ($834M). ESQ has higher P/E ratio than SFBS: ESQ (17.14) vs SFBS (15.13). ESQ YTD gains are higher at: 23.278 vs. SFBS (-14.494). SFBS has more cash in the bank: 141M vs. ESQ (614K). ESQ has less debt than SFBS: ESQ (49K) vs SFBS (64.7M). SFBS has higher revenues than ESQ: SFBS (516M) vs ESQ (135M).
ESQSFBSESQ / SFBS
Capitalization834M3.86B22%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.278-14.494-161%
P/E Ratio17.1415.13113%
Revenue135M516M26%
Total Cash614K141M0%
Total Debt49K64.7M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ESQ vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
ESQ
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
218
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
456
SMR RATING
1..100
3016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5077
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2788
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBS's Valuation (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESQ (83) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

ESQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ESQ (30) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to ESQ’s over the last 12 months.

ESQ's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

ESQ's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ESQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ESQSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ESQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEAX18.710.02
+0.11%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity A
KLGAX57.330.02
+0.03%
NYLI WMC Growth Class A
ESCKX16.87N/A
N/A
1290 Essex Small Cap Growth R
LRSFX15.24-0.01
-0.07%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
JUEQX28.40-0.03
-0.11%
JPMorgan US Equity R4

ESQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESQ has been closely correlated with SMBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESQ jumps, then SMBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESQ
1D Price
Change %
ESQ100%
-2.16%
SMBC - ESQ
66%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
TRMK - ESQ
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
SNV - ESQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
STBA - ESQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
SFBS - ESQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
-1.48%
TRMK - SFBS
88%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
FNB - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
SBCF - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
UBSI - SFBS
87%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
WSFS - SFBS
86%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
More