EHC
Price
$114.28
Change
-$0.52 (-0.45%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.5B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PACS
Price
$10.46
Change
-$0.25 (-2.34%)
Updated
Nov 14, 01:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.66B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EHC vs PACS

Header iconEHC vs PACS Comparison
Open Charts EHC vs PACSBanner chart's image
Encompass Health
Price$114.28
Change-$0.52 (-0.45%)
Volume$517.07K
Capitalization11.5B
PACS Group
Price$10.46
Change-$0.25 (-2.34%)
Volume$1.65K
Capitalization1.66B
EHC vs PACS Comparison Chart in %
EHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PACS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EHC vs. PACS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EHC is a Hold and PACS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EHC: $114.28 vs. PACS: $10.70)
Brand notoriety: EHC and PACS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EHC: 70% vs. PACS: 79%
Market capitalization -- EHC: $11.5B vs. PACS: $1.66B
EHC [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $11.5B. PACS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $1.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $108B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePACS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PACS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EHC is a better buy in the long-term than PACS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EHC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PACS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PACS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PACS is a better buy in the short-term than EHC.

Price Growth

EHC (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -0.69% price change this week, while PACS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -14.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

EHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

PACS is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-1.88% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EHC($11.5B) has a higher market cap than PACS($1.66B). EHC has higher P/E ratio than PACS: EHC (21.52) vs PACS (17.67). EHC YTD gains are higher at: 24.542 vs. PACS (-18.383). EHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.31B vs. PACS (216M). EHC has more cash in the bank: 85.4M vs. PACS (73.4M). PACS (2.67B) and EHC (2.69B) have identical debt. EHC has higher revenues than PACS: EHC (5.67B) vs PACS (3.56B).
EHCPACSEHC / PACS
Capitalization11.5B1.66B693%
EBITDA1.31B216M605%
Gain YTD24.542-18.383-134%
P/E Ratio21.5217.67122%
Revenue5.67B3.56B159%
Total Cash85.4M73.4M116%
Total Debt2.69B2.67B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EHC: Fundamental Ratings
EHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EHCPACS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PACS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVS10.080.41
+4.21%
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares
EFFI24.61N/A
N/A
Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF
NANC45.34-0.97
-2.10%
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF
EHLS22.73-0.71
-3.04%
Even Herd Long Short ETF
FPX156.44-6.17
-3.79%
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF

EHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EHC has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EHC jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EHC
1D Price
Change %
EHC100%
-0.45%
UHS - EHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
ENSG - EHC
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
THC - EHC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
HCA - EHC
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
NHC - EHC
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
More

PACS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PACS has been loosely correlated with ENSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PACS jumps, then ENSG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PACS
1D Price
Change %
PACS100%
-6.63%
ENSG - PACS
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
NHC - PACS
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
UHS - PACS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
EHC - PACS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ACHC - PACS
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.64%
More