It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
DNB (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.04%.
DNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2024.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
DNB | MS | DNB / MS | |
Capitalization | 4.41B | 154B | 3% |
EBITDA | 728M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 3.601 | 9.468 | 38% |
P/E Ratio | 23.20 | 18.06 | 128% |
Revenue | 2.31B | 50.7B | 5% |
Total Cash | 188M | 4.29B | 4% |
Total Debt | 3.59B | 276B | 1% |
DNB | MS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DNB's Valuation (26) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MS (94) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that DNB’s stock grew significantly faster than MS’s over the last 12 months.
MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNB (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than DNB’s over the last 12 months.
MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNB (90) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than DNB’s over the last 12 months.
DNB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MS (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that DNB’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.
MS's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNB (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNB’s over the last 12 months.
DNB | MS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | about 1 month ago0% |
MACD ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago77% | about 2 months ago0% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNB has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNB jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been loosely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MS jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.