DIT
Price
$117.00
Change
-$0.45 (-0.38%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
76.43M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFGC
Price
$94.70
Change
-$0.64 (-0.67%)
Updated
Nov 14, 02:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.95B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIT vs PFGC

Header iconDIT vs PFGC Comparison
Open Charts DIT vs PFGCBanner chart's image
AMCON Distributing
Price$117.00
Change-$0.45 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization76.43M
Performance Food Group
Price$94.70
Change-$0.64 (-0.67%)
Volume$500
Capitalization14.95B
DIT vs PFGC Comparison Chart in %
DIT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIT vs. PFGC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIT is a StrongBuy and PFGC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (DIT: $117.45 vs. PFGC: $95.34)
Brand notoriety: DIT and PFGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIT: 127% vs. PFGC: 81%
Market capitalization -- DIT: $76.43M vs. PFGC: $14.95B
DIT [@Food Distributors] is valued at $76.43M. PFGC’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $14.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $35.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DIT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFGC is a better buy in the long-term than DIT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PFGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DIT is a better buy in the short-term than PFGC.

Price Growth

DIT (@Food Distributors) experienced а +0.94% price change this week, while PFGC (@Food Distributors) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -3.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIT is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

PFGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-3.47% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFGC($15B) has a higher market cap than DIT($76.4M). DIT has higher P/E ratio than PFGC: DIT (127.66) vs PFGC (45.62). PFGC YTD gains are higher at: 12.762 vs. DIT (-7.813). PFGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.54B vs. DIT (23.5M). PFGC has more cash in the bank: 78.5M vs. DIT (826K). DIT has less debt than PFGC: DIT (200M) vs PFGC (8B). PFGC has higher revenues than DIT: PFGC (63.3B) vs DIT (2.82B).
DITPFGCDIT / PFGC
Capitalization76.4M15B1%
EBITDA23.5M1.54B2%
Gain YTD-7.81312.762-61%
P/E Ratio127.6645.62280%
Revenue2.82B63.3B4%
Total Cash826K78.5M1%
Total Debt200M8B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIT vs PFGC: Fundamental Ratings
DIT
PFGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
556
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7012
SMR RATING
1..100
9077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFGC's Valuation (71) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as DIT (79) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to DIT’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DIT (70) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DIT’s over the last 12 months.

PFGC's SMR Rating (77) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as DIT (90) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to DIT’s over the last 12 months.

DIT's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PFGC (57) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that DIT’s stock grew similarly to PFGC’s over the last 12 months.

DIT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PFGC (13) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that DIT’s stock grew similarly to PFGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DITPFGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLPG0.050.01
+26.88%
Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.
KAYS0.05N/A
N/A
Kaya Holdings, Inc.
LIOPY16.40N/A
N/A
Lion Corp.
BATMF0.57N/A
N/A
British American Tobacco Malaysia Bhd
OUKPY8.12-0.31
-3.68%
Metso OYJ

DIT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DIT and CVGW have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DIT and CVGW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIT
1D Price
Change %
DIT100%
N/A
CVGW - DIT
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
MTTWF - DIT
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYY - DIT
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
JRONF - DIT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USFD - DIT
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More

PFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFGC has been closely correlated with USFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFGC jumps, then USFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFGC
1D Price
Change %
PFGC100%
-1.27%
USFD - PFGC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
CHEF - PFGC
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.64%
UNFI - PFGC
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.47%
SYY - PFGC
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
ANDE - PFGC
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
More