BY
Price
$27.30
Change
-$0.20 (-0.73%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.25B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NBHC
Price
$36.71
Change
-$0.37 (-1.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs NBHC

Header iconBY vs NBHC Comparison
Open Charts BY vs NBHCBanner chart's image
Byline Ban
Price$27.30
Change-$0.20 (-0.73%)
Volume$564
Capitalization1.25B
NATIONAL BANK HOLDINGS
Price$36.71
Change-$0.37 (-1.00%)
Volume$184.26K
Capitalization1.39B
BY vs NBHC Comparison Chart in %
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. NBHC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a StrongBuy and NBHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BY: $27.50 vs. NBHC: $37.08)
Brand notoriety: BY and NBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 104% vs. NBHC: 65%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.25B vs. NBHC: $1.39B
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.25B. NBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNBHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than NBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NBHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the short-term than NBHC.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.29% price change this week, while NBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

NBHC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBHC($1.39B) has a higher market cap than BY($1.25B). NBHC has higher P/E ratio than BY: NBHC (11.65) vs BY (9.75). BY YTD gains are higher at: -3.746 vs. NBHC (-11.901). NBHC has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. BY (75.1M). NBHC has less debt than BY: NBHC (239M) vs BY (525M). BY (416M) and NBHC (409M) have equivalent revenues.
BYNBHCBY / NBHC
Capitalization1.25B1.39B90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.746-11.90131%
P/E Ratio9.7511.6584%
Revenue416M409M102%
Total Cash75.1M369M20%
Total Debt525M239M220%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs NBHC: Fundamental Ratings
BY
NBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1413
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3464
SMR RATING
1..100
1920
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6371
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (43). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (64). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

BY's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (20). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (60). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NBHC (71). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to NBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYNBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEDSX32.800.14
+0.43%
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
NBNAX15.400.06
+0.39%
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
BGITX15.160.04
+0.23%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 2
SFMIX43.62-0.01
-0.02%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5
RGSAX32.61-0.12
-0.37%
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap A

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
+0.11%
BFST - BY
88%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
FBK - BY
88%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
EFSC - BY
88%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
WSFS - BY
88%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
HOPE - BY
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

NBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBHC has been closely correlated with PFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBHC jumps, then PFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBHC
1D Price
Change %
NBHC100%
-0.38%
PFS - NBHC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
PEBO - NBHC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
EFSC - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
TRMK - NBHC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
BY - NBHC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More