BWFG
Price
$45.50
Change
+$0.40 (+0.89%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
358.42M
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WASH
Price
$27.79
Change
-$0.23 (-0.82%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
529.55M
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs WASH

Header iconBWFG vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs WASHBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$45.50
Change+$0.40 (+0.89%)
Volume$15.73K
Capitalization358.42M
Washington Trust Ban
Price$27.79
Change-$0.23 (-0.82%)
Volume$87.11K
Capitalization529.55M
BWFG vs WASH Comparison Chart in %
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. WASH commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a StrongBuy and WASH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $45.50 vs. WASH: $27.79)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 50% vs. WASH: 60%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $358.42M vs. WASH: $529.55M
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $358.42M. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $529.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the short-term than WASH.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.51% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WASH($530M) has a higher market cap than BWFG($358M). BWFG (12.43) and WASH (12.16) have similar P/E ratio . BWFG YTD gains are higher at: 49.281 vs. WASH (-3.574). BWFG has less debt than WASH: BWFG (145M) vs WASH (1.06B). WASH has higher revenues than BWFG: WASH (111M) vs BWFG (99.2M).
BWFGWASHBWFG / WASH
Capitalization358M530M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD49.281-3.574-1,379%
P/E Ratio12.4312.16102%
Revenue99.2M111M89%
Total CashN/A44M-
Total Debt145M1.06B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1515
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1588
SMR RATING
1..100
4367
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WASH's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (57). This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for WASH (88). This means that BWFG’s stock grew significantly faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's SMR Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (67). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (58). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWFG (75). This means that WASH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPHLY34.65N/A
N/A
Bank of the Philippine Islands
VVIVF0.11N/A
N/A
REPLENISH NUTRIENTS HLDG CORP.
CICHF1.06-0.02
-1.86%
China Construction Bank Corp.
HMNTY19.18-0.60
-3.03%
HEMNET GROUP AB
PTRUF1.25-0.06
-4.58%
Petrus Resources Ltd.

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
+0.88%
TRMK - BWFG
76%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
TMP - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
TCBK - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
WASH - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
ONB - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
More

WASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WASH has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WASH jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WASH
1D Price
Change %
WASH100%
-0.36%
PEBO - WASH
87%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
CBU - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
STBA - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CTBI - WASH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
TRMK - WASH
85%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
More