It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileESS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRT (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while ESS (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.52%.
BRT is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.
ESS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| BRT | ESS | BRT / ESS | |
| Capitalization | 270M | 16.3B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 40M | 1.72B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -17.565 | -7.913 | 222% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.75 | 19.29 | 455% |
| Revenue | 95.9M | 1.84B | 5% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 482M | 6.81B | 7% |
BRT | ESS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRT's Valuation (13) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESS (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew significantly faster than ESS’s over the last 12 months.
BRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as ESS (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew similarly to ESS’s over the last 12 months.
ESS's SMR Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRT (92) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ESS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRT’s over the last 12 months.
ESS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BRT (73) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that ESS’s stock grew similarly to BRT’s over the last 12 months.
BRT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for ESS (91) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew significantly faster than ESS’s over the last 12 months.
| BRT | ESS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | 10 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 42% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRT has been loosely correlated with NXRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRT jumps, then NXRT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESS has been closely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESS jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.