BLMN
Price
$16.80
Change
-$0.13 (-0.77%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
26 days until earnings call
JACK
Price
$45.41
Change
+$1.20 (+2.71%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLMN vs JACK

Header iconBLMN vs JACK Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs JACKBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$16.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.77%)
Volume$1M
CapitalizationN/A
Jack In The Box
Price$45.41
Change+$1.20 (+2.71%)
Volume$372.48K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BLMN vs JACK Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
JACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BLMN vs. JACK commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a Hold and JACK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (BLMN: $17.24 vs. JACK: $46.91)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and JACK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 74% vs. JACK: 151%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $1.43B vs. JACK: $868.51M
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.43B. JACK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $868.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJACK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JACK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLMN is a better buy in the long-term than JACK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JACK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JACK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BLMN and JACK are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while JACK (@Restaurants) price change was -6.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 25, 2024.

JACK is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.94% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLMN($1.43B) has a higher market cap than JACK($869M). BLMN has higher P/E ratio than JACK: BLMN (57.93) vs JACK (9.34). BLMN YTD gains are higher at: -36.769 vs. JACK (-41.223). BLMN has less debt than JACK: BLMN (2.26B) vs JACK (3.18B).
BLMNJACKBLMN / JACK
Capitalization1.43B869M164%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-36.769-41.22389%
P/E Ratio57.939.34620%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A21.6M-
Total Debt2.26B3.18B71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs JACK: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
JACK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
287
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JACK's Valuation (11) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (19). This means that JACK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as JACK (100). This means that BLMN’s stock grew similarly to JACK’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's SMR Rating (1) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (16). This means that JACK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

JACK's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BLMN (84). This means that JACK’s stock grew similarly to BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for JACK (87). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than JACK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNJACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 2 months ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
72%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
JACK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

BLMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLMN has been loosely correlated with DRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLMN jumps, then DRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLMN
1D Price
Change %
BLMN100%
-1.49%
DRI - BLMN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
DIN - BLMN
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.49%
DENN - BLMN
54%
Loosely correlated
-5.96%
CAKE - BLMN
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
TXRH - BLMN
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

JACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JACK has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JACK jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JACK
1D Price
Change %
JACK100%
-4.96%
DIN - JACK
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.49%
RICK - JACK
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.66%
BJRI - JACK
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
PTLO - JACK
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
BLMN - JACK
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More