Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIEMX vs FWWNX
BIEMX vs FWWNX Comparison
Open Charts BIEMX vs FWWNX
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth R6
Price$16.20
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds New World 529-F-3
Price$97.05
Change-$1.25 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
BIEMX vs FWWNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. BIEMX (1.02B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than BIEMX: FWWNX (0.95) vs BIEMX (0.11). BIEMX was incepted earlier than FWWNX: BIEMX (20 years) vs FWWNX (5 years). BIEMX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.63). BIEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FWWNX (37.00). FWWNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIEMX: FWWNX (250) vs BIEMX (1000000). BIEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.88 vs. FWWNX (21.65). FWWNX return over 5 years is better than : 28.35 vs. BIEMX (-9.45).
| BIEMX | FWWNX | BIEMX / FWWNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.63 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.63 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.807 | 28.245 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 76.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.95 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.88 | 21.65 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.39 | 52.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.45 | 28.35 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement