BCBP
Price
$7.69
Change
+$0.02 (+0.26%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
132.48M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FFWM
Price
$5.06
Change
-$0.02 (-0.39%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
419.4M
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCBP vs FFWM

Header iconBCBP vs FFWM Comparison
Open Charts BCBP vs FFWMBanner chart's image
BCB Ban
Price$7.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
Volume$219
Capitalization132.48M
First Foundation
Price$5.06
Change-$0.02 (-0.39%)
Volume$872.22K
Capitalization419.4M
BCBP vs FFWM Comparison Chart in %
BCBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCBP vs. FFWM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCBP is a StrongBuy and FFWM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BCBP: $7.67 vs. FFWM: $5.08)
Brand notoriety: BCBP and FFWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCBP: 113% vs. FFWM: 111%
Market capitalization -- BCBP: $132.48M vs. FFWM: $419.4M
BCBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $132.48M. FFWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $419.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCBP is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCBP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCBP is a better buy in the short-term than FFWM.

Price Growth

BCBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while FFWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCBP is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFWM($419M) has a higher market cap than BCBP($132M). BCBP has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: BCBP (128.17) vs FFWM (41.60). FFWM YTD gains are higher at: -18.196 vs. BCBP (-30.282). BCBP has less debt than FFWM: BCBP (391M) vs FFWM (1.84B). BCBP has higher revenues than FFWM: BCBP (98.6M) vs FFWM (66.3M).
BCBPFFWMBCBP / FFWM
Capitalization132M419M32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-30.282-18.196166%
P/E Ratio128.1741.60308%
Revenue98.6M66.3M149%
Total Cash11.9MN/A-
Total Debt391M1.84B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCBP vs FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
BCBP
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
952
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
7561
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6378
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
258
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWM's Valuation (91) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCBP (97). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

BCBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (100). This means that BCBP’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's SMR Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BCBP (75). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to BCBP’s over the last 12 months.

BCBP's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (78). This means that BCBP’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

BCBP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (58). This means that BCBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCBPFFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FFWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSGUF4.520.07
+1.57%
Rogers Sugar Inc.
SIGY2.00N/A
N/A
Sigyn Therapeutics Inc.
RIOCF13.44-0.02
-0.15%
Riocan Real Estate Investment Trust
ASBFY29.59-0.31
-1.05%
Associated British Foods plc
EQTRF0.18-0.01
-6.96%
Altamira Gold Corp

BCBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCBP has been closely correlated with KRNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCBP jumps, then KRNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCBP
1D Price
Change %
BCBP100%
-1.54%
KRNY - BCBP
69%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
UBSI - BCBP
68%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
HOPE - BCBP
68%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
MCBS - BCBP
68%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
FFWM - BCBP
68%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
More

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with STEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then STEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
-0.78%
STEL - FFWM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
TRMK - FFWM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
CVBF - FFWM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
UBSI - FFWM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
UMBF - FFWM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More