BANF
Price
$110.08
Change
-$2.17 (-1.93%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.74B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NFBK
Price
$10.53
Change
+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
439.33M
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANF vs NFBK

Header iconBANF vs NFBK Comparison
Open Charts BANF vs NFBKBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$110.08
Change-$2.17 (-1.93%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization3.74B
Northfield Ban
Price$10.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Volume$978
Capitalization439.33M
BANF vs NFBK Comparison Chart in %
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NFBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANF vs. NFBK commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a Buy and NFBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BANF: $112.25 vs. NFBK: $10.50)
Brand notoriety: BANF and NFBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 97% vs. NFBK: 58%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $3.74B vs. NFBK: $439.33M
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.74B. NFBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $439.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNFBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NFBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BANF and NFBK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NFBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANF is a better buy in the short-term than NFBK.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.46% price change this week, while NFBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

NFBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANF($3.74B) has a higher market cap than NFBK($439M). BANF has higher P/E ratio than NFBK: BANF (15.92) vs NFBK (10.84). BANF YTD gains are higher at: -3.076 vs. NFBK (-5.232). BANF has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. NFBK (12M). BANF has less debt than NFBK: BANF (92M) vs NFBK (924M). BANF has higher revenues than NFBK: BANF (661M) vs NFBK (139M).
BANFNFBKBANF / NFBK
Capitalization3.74B439M851%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.076-5.23259%
P/E Ratio15.9210.84147%
Revenue661M139M476%
Total Cash260M12M2,167%
Total Debt92M924M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs NFBK: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
NFBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2779
SMR RATING
1..100
1647
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7676
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NFBK's Valuation (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANF (76). This means that NFBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFBK (79). This means that BANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFBK’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NFBK (47). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to NFBK’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NFBK (76). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to NFBK’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NFBK (92). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to NFBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFNFBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NFBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SASVX6.680.02
+0.30%
Virtus Ceredex Small-Cap Value Eq A
PIBAX19.580.05
+0.26%
PGIM Balanced A
PMBMX41.910.07
+0.17%
Principal MidCap R3
IPSSX22.510.01
+0.04%
Voya Index Plus SmallCap Port S
CVTCX57.00-0.03
-0.05%
Calamos Growth & Income C

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
-0.58%
UBSI - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
TRMK - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
HOPE - BANF
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
HWC - BANF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
TCBK - BANF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More

NFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFBK has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NFBK jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFBK
1D Price
Change %
NFBK100%
+0.77%
FMBH - NFBK
84%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
BANF - NFBK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
WSFS - NFBK
82%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
BY - NFBK
81%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
NWBI - NFBK
81%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
More