AGYS
Price
$125.42
Change
-$3.10 (-2.41%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.52B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTWO
Price
$71.72
Change
-$1.60 (-2.18%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.48B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGYS vs QTWO

Header iconAGYS vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts AGYS vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Agilysys
Price$125.42
Change-$3.10 (-2.41%)
Volume$1.49K
Capitalization3.52B
Q2 Holdings
Price$71.72
Change-$1.60 (-2.18%)
Volume$713.71K
Capitalization4.48B
AGYS vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
AGYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGYS vs. QTWO commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGYS is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (AGYS: $128.52 vs. QTWO: $73.32)
Brand notoriety: AGYS and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGYS: 137% vs. QTWO: 72%
Market capitalization -- AGYS: $3.52B vs. QTWO: $4.48B
AGYS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.52B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $294.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGYS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AGYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGYS is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGYS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGYS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than AGYS.

Price Growth

AGYS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.86% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +19.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

AGYS is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.88% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.49B) has a higher market cap than AGYS($3.52B). AGYS (145.84) and QTWO (143.44) have similar P/E ratio . AGYS YTD gains are higher at: -2.422 vs. QTWO (-27.154). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. AGYS (34.3M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. AGYS (55.6M). AGYS has less debt than QTWO: AGYS (33.9M) vs QTWO (539M). QTWO has higher revenues than AGYS: QTWO (743M) vs AGYS (289M).
AGYSQTWOAGYS / QTWO
Capitalization3.52B4.49B78%
EBITDA34.3M77.5M44%
Gain YTD-2.422-27.1549%
P/E Ratio145.84143.44102%
Revenue289M743M39%
Total Cash55.6M532M10%
Total Debt33.9M539M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGYS vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
AGYS
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1820
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
8390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (81) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AGYS (84) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to AGYS’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's SMR Rating (83) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as QTWO (57) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

AGYS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGYSQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCGHX16.960.17
+1.01%
Virtus KAR Health Sciences C
WPOIX12.080.04
+0.33%
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Investor
MXMVX14.240.03
+0.21%
Empower Mid Cap Value Inv
GSIMX23.420.04
+0.17%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Instl
LCLCX52.46-0.05
-0.10%
ClearBridge Select C

AGYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGYS has been loosely correlated with EVCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGYS jumps, then EVCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGYS
1D Price
Change %
AGYS100%
+0.41%
EVCM - AGYS
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
WK - AGYS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
PRGS - AGYS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
QTWO - AGYS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
BL - AGYS
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.12%
FRSH - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALKT - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
COIN - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
CPAY - QTWO
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
More