AFRM
Price
$41.16
Change
-$0.48 (-1.15%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
38 days until earnings call
ML
Price
$40.39
Change
+$1.25 (+3.19%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

AFRM vs ML

Header iconAFRM vs ML Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs MLBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$41.16
Change-$0.48 (-1.15%)
Volume$5.09M
CapitalizationN/A
MoneyLion
Price$40.39
Change+$1.25 (+3.19%)
Volume$173.85K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AFRM vs ML Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AFRM vs. ML commentary
Sep 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a StrongBuy and ML is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2024
Stock price -- (AFRM: $41.59 vs. ML: $42.90)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and ML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 195% vs. ML: 59%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $11.43B vs. ML: $698.72M
AFRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.43B. ML’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $698.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileML’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than ML.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ML’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ML’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the short-term than ML.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +27.93% price change this week, while ML (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

ML is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($11.4B) has a higher market cap than ML($699M). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: -15.364 vs. ML (-31.568). ML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17M vs. AFRM (-322M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. ML (92.2M). ML has less debt than AFRM: ML (190M) vs AFRM (6.24B). AFRM has higher revenues than ML: AFRM (1.91B) vs ML (423M).
AFRMMLAFRM / ML
Capitalization11.4B699M1,631%
EBITDA-322M7.17M-4,492%
Gain YTD-15.364-31.56849%
P/E RatioN/A1.80-
Revenue1.91B423M452%
Total Cash1.95B92.2M2,116%
Total Debt6.24B190M3,286%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMML
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
89%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been loosely correlated with SQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then SQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-5.50%
SQ - AFRM
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
QTWO - AFRM
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
U - AFRM
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
BIGC - AFRM
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
ACIW - AFRM
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
More

ML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ML has been loosely correlated with AFRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ML jumps, then AFRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ML
1D Price
Change %
ML100%
-7.58%
AFRM - ML
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.50%
SDGR - ML
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
ENFN - ML
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
PGY - ML
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.23%
INFA - ML
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.01%
More